Dems Abandon El-Sayed Day Before Voting

Voter fills out ballot at a polling booth
Photo: Rob Crandall / Shutterstock

A sitting Michigan Democrat stood next to a Republican Senate candidate two days before the election and told voters to pick him instead of her own party’s nominee.

Quick Take

  • Representative Haley Stevens endorsed Republican Mike Rogers over Democrat Abdul El-Sayed on November 1, 2026, just before Election Day.
  • Stevens said El-Sayed told her she was “no longer welcome” in his campaign, and she agreed with him.
  • El-Sayed brushed off the endorsement, and top Democrats like Chuck Schumer quickly reaffirmed support for him.
  • Political scientists say endorsements like this usually move only a small slice of voters, even in close races.

A Former Rival Breaks Ranks Days Before The Vote

Haley Stevens lost the Democratic Senate primary to Abdul El-Sayed earlier this year. She had backed him afterward, at least publicly. That changed on November 1, 2026, when she posted a video endorsing Mike Rogers instead. “Abdul said that I was no longer welcome in his campaign and that I should stay away,” Stevens said. “And he’s right, and that’s why I am endorsing Mike Rogers.”

Stevens didn’t just post a video and disappear. She showed up at Perfecting Church in Detroit alongside Rogers and made her endorsement in person. That is a far bigger statement than a tweet. It turned a private falling-out into a public, visible break that every Michigan voter heading to the polls could see for themselves.

Democrats Scramble To Hold The Line For El-Sayed

El-Sayed didn’t blink. Asked about Stevens, he said plainly that he doesn’t spend much time thinking about her, adding that Michigan’s ten million residents “deserve a lot better from the government” than a distraction like this. His campaign framed the moment as noise, not news.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer moved fast to shut down any sense of panic, declaring that “Senate Democrats are united in our support for Abdul El-Sayed” and calling Rogers “a tool of Donald Trump and billionaire donors.” Barack Obama, Kamala Harris, and other high-profile Democrats had already backed El-Sayed on economic grounds, from health care costs to jobs.

The timing mattered more than the message, in some ways. Stevens’ reversal landed less than 48 hours before polls opened, leaving almost no runway for debates, polling, or sustained coverage of why she switched. Reports also noted other Michigan Democrats, including a former Detroit congressman, reportedly crossing over around the same time, adding to the sense of a party in disarray at the worst possible moment.

Does A Late Defection Actually Move Votes?

Here is the uncomfortable truth for both campaigns: dramatic endorsements rarely swing elections by themselves. Research on more than 50 million 2020 ballots found that 23% of voters split their ticket somewhere on the ballot, but the truly persuadable slice, the voters who might actually change their mind because of a single endorsement, is likely closer to 5% to 10% of the electorate. A University of Georgia study found just 6.1% of voters split tickets in a hard-fought 2022 Senate and governor race. Close elections can turn on numbers that small. That’s exactly why both sides treated this moment like it mattered.

What makes this different from typical horse-race drama is the source. This wasn’t an outside pundit or a disgruntled activist. It was El-Sayed’s own former primary opponent, someone who knew the campaign from the inside and chose the final hours before voting to say she couldn’t stand behind him anymore. Whether or not it changes the outcome, it hands Michigan voters a loud, late, and very public reason to pause before filling in their ballot.

Sources:

nypost.com, abc7.com, abc6onyourside.com, charlotteobserver.com, washingtonpost.com, politico.com, maxwell.syr.edu