Iranians Appeal to Dem Voters in Trump-Deranged ‘Open Letter’

Soldiers stand beside large missiles at an outdoor display
Photo: saeediex / Shutterstock

Iran’s Revolutionary Guard tried to sway America’s midterms with a 25-page plea to vote against Trump’s agenda.

Story Snapshot

  • Iran’s Revolutionary Guard addressed U.S. voters in a long open letter ahead of midterms.
  • The letter urges rejection of President Trump’s policies and support for Israel.
  • The message frames “peaceful coexistence” if U.S. policy changes.
  • Analysts link the move to broader foreign influence tactics that target divisions.

What Tehran Said And Why It Chose Now

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps released a 25-page open letter to Americans weeks before midterms. The letter urges voters to reject President Trump’s policies and to pull back support for Israel and foreign wars, and it claims Iran and the United States could coexist if Washington shifts course. The timing serves a clear aim. Elections focus public attention. Messages that echo hot debates can travel fast. Foreign actors know that well, and they press those buttons when turnout is in play.

The document calls Trump a “big liar,” warns about war costs, and says U.S. citizens must “wrest control back from corrupt politicians”. That language mirrors long-running talking points from Tehran. It seeks to paint the White House as the source of conflict and Iran as a forced responder. It also tries to split American audiences by tying Iran policy to broader themes of corruption, endless war, and elite failure—narratives that already churn online in both left and right spaces.

How The Message Fits Iran’s Playbook

National security reporting shows Iran often works to inflame rifts rather than persuade swing voters one by one. The goal is to deepen mistrust in leaders and systems so policy becomes harder to sustain. Past assessments document Iranian efforts that mixed direct outreach with covert media, fake outlets, and social tricks to boost regime lines. The open letter tracks with that logic: validate doubts that already exist and let Americans fight each other over it, while Tehran poses as the voice of reason.

U.S. intelligence reporting on earlier cycles described Iran’s influence efforts as a blend of cyber moves and propaganda aimed at shaking confidence and turning Americans against each other. The shape shifts, but the target stays the same: public trust. Tehran knows that if U.S. leaders look divided at home, pressure on Iran can slacken abroad. That does not make every American critic a pawn. It does mean foreign regimes try to ride those currents when it suits their aims.

Why This Matters For Voters, Not Just Spies

American elections do not need many outside voices to change. They need only one that hits a nerve at the right moment. The Guard’s letter tries to merge three hot wires—Israel, war fatigue, and anger at elites—and then route that charge into the ballot box. Adults can debate policy with open eyes. But when a foreign military arm speaks into that process, the motive is not civic duty. It is leverage over U.S. choices that affect the Middle East balance.

Common sense asks a simple test. If a designated arm of Iran says your vote should punish a U.S. policy, does that advice serve American interests or Iran’s strategy. The answer is clear. Free citizens can oppose war and still reject foreign pressure. The right response is not rage or panic. It is a steady norm: Americans set American policy. Debate hard. Check the facts. Then make choices for the country, not for a regime that openly seeks to bend it.

Sources:

iranintl.com, reuters.com, freepressjournal.in, timesofindia.indiatimes.com