Inside Rep. Dusty Johnson’s Influence on Medicaid Cuts and Fiscal Policies

House Republicans are navigating treacherous political waters as their $880 billion Medicaid cuts proposal threatened to sink the party’s broader budget reconciliation bill, putting Rep. Dusty Johnson in the spotlight as he defends the controversial plan.

Key Takeaways

House GOP’s budget reconciliation bill includes $880 billion in Medicaid cuts over ten years while extending Trump’s tax cuts
The bill faced potential failure with at least two Republican lawmakers openly opposing it and several others undecided before the vote
Speaker Mike Johnson could only afford to lose one Republican vote if all Democrats opposed the measure
Rep. Dusty Johnson has emerged as a key defender of the controversial spending cuts
The budget plan narrowly passed with a 217-215 vote, highlighting deep divisions within the Republican caucus

Republican Budget Plan Hangs by a Thread

The House Republican budget reconciliation bill, designed to advance President Trump’s priorities on border security, defense, taxes, and energy, faced significant headwinds from within the GOP caucus. With a razor-thin Republican majority, Speaker Mike Johnson could only lose one vote if all Democrats opposed the measure. Before the vote Representatives Tim Burchett and Victoria Spartz had publicly declared their opposition to the bill, citing concerns about government spending.

The ambitious budget blueprint proposes $300 billion in increased spending for border security, judiciary, and defense while seeking $1.5 to $2 trillion in cuts elsewhere. It also includes $4.5 trillion to extend Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The most contentious element remains the proposed $880 billion reduction in Medicaid funding over the next decade, which has created significant division within Republican ranks.

BREAKING: The House has passed the Republican budget resolution after a tumultuous night on the floor and resistance from Democrats and some GOP members. The measure increases the debt ceiling, extends President Donald Trump's signature tax cuts, and provides funds for border… pic.twitter.com/RsWakzYVbu

— NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) February 26, 2025

Medicaid Cuts Draw Scrutiny

The proposed Medicaid cuts have become a lightning rod for criticism, with several Republican representatives from moderate districts expressing serious reservations. Rep. Nicole Malliotakis of New York indicated before the vote that “somewhere between six and 10” Republican lawmakers remained undecided about supporting the bill, citing concerns about cuts to Medicaid and other federal programs.

Rep. Dusty Johnson of South Dakota has emerged as a key defender of the controversial plan, making appearances on programs like CBS’s “America Decides” to justify the substantial Medicaid reductions. His position underscores the GOP’s challenging balancing act between fiscal responsibility and maintaining essential social services that many Americans rely on.

Narrow Victory Reveals GOP Divisions

The House recently passed the Republican budget resolution by the narrowest of margins, with a vote of 217 to 215. This slim victory highlights the significant divisions within the Republican caucus regarding which federal programs should be cut to fund the proposed tax cuts. The chaotic voting process revealed a revolt from conservative members seeking even deeper spending cuts.

The budget resolution’s approval marks a critical step for Republicans to use the reconciliation process, which would allow their fiscal package to bypass a potential filibuster in the Senate and pass with a simple majority. However, some Republicans, including Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, have expressed opposition to the budget plan, arguing that it would actually worsen the deficit rather than improve it.

Trump’s Agenda Hangs in the Balance

Speaker Johnson has emphasized the importance of passing the budget reconciliation bill to fulfill President Trump’s complete agenda. The speaker has positioned the current legislative efforts as a comprehensive approach rather than a piecemeal strategy, stating that Republicans must deliver on their promises in full rather than incrementally when discussing the bill going on to say “This has been necessary because we promised to deliver President Trump’s full agenda, not just a part of it. We’re not just going to do a little bit now and return later for the rest. We have to do it now.”