Chinese Spyware INVADES American Homes – Check Yours Now!

Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers has filed a lawsuit against security camera company Lorex, alleging the firm deceived American families about privacy protections while potentially funneling intimate home surveillance data to the Chinese Communist Party through sanctioned technology suppliers.

Story Snapshot

Nebraska AG sues Lorex for allegedly misleading consumers about privacy risks from Chinese-linked surveillance equipment
Lorex used technology from Dahua, a sanctioned Chinese firm implicated in human rights abuses and banned by Congress
Multiple states investigating similar privacy deception claims as Chinese surveillance threatens American families
Major retailers pulled Lorex products from shelves due to national security and human rights concerns

Chinese Surveillance Technology Infiltrates American Homes

Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers filed a lawsuit against Lorex, a security camera manufacturer, for allegedly deceiving consumers about privacy protections while using technology from sanctioned Chinese surveillance firm Dahua Technology. The lawsuit claims Lorex misled American families about the security risks of installing cameras that could potentially transmit private home data to foreign adversaries. This represents a direct threat to family privacy and national security, as parents unknowingly invited Chinese Communist Party surveillance into their most intimate spaces.

Lawsuit claims baby monitors marketed as safe may be feeding data to Beijing https://t.co/Fid5BD5YhK

— Fox News Politics (@foxnewspolitics) September 23, 2025

Dahua Technology, Lorex’s former owner and ongoing component supplier, has been implicated in systematic human rights abuses against Uighur Muslims in China’s Xinjiang region. Congress banned federal agencies from purchasing Dahua and Lorex products in 2019 under the National Defense Authorization Act due to national security concerns. Despite this federal recognition of the threat, Lorex continued marketing its products to unsuspecting American consumers without adequately disclosing the Chinese connections and associated risks.

State Attorneys General Lead Consumer Protection Fight

Multiple state attorneys general are taking action where federal enforcement has fallen short. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier issued a subpoena to Lorex, declaring that “The Chinese Communist Party cannot be allowed to spy on American children. Florida will not tolerate it, and we will hold bad actors accountable.” This coordinated state-level response demonstrates growing recognition that Chinese surveillance poses an immediate threat to American families that demands aggressive legal intervention.

The timeline reveals a pattern of deception spanning years. Dahua acquired Lorex in 2012, operating it as a Chinese-owned surveillance company until selling it to Taiwanese firm Skywatch in 2022. However, concerns persist about ongoing component sourcing from Dahua, suggesting the Chinese surveillance apparatus maintained access to American homes even after the ownership transfer. This supply chain obfuscation represents exactly the kind of foreign manipulation that threatens constitutional protections and family privacy.

Retailers Abandon Compromised Surveillance Products

Major American retailers including Home Depot, Best Buy, and Lowe’s pulled Lorex products from their shelves due to human rights and national security concerns. These corporate decisions acknowledge what federal agencies have confirmed: Chinese surveillance technology poses unacceptable risks to American consumers. The retailer exodus demonstrates how private market forces can reinforce national security priorities when government enforcement proves inadequate.

The broader implications extend beyond individual privacy violations to systemic threats against American sovereignty. Chinese surveillance firms like Dahua don’t operate independently but serve the Communist Party’s intelligence apparatus. When American families install these cameras in nurseries and living rooms, they potentially provide foreign adversaries with unprecedented access to intimate family life. This represents government overreach by proxy, where foreign surveillance accomplishes what domestic spying programs cannot constitutionally achieve.